Skip to content
ATS Mako
Glossary — Onboarding & Compliance

Reference Check

Contacting people a candidate has worked for or with previously to verify their history and performance, usually late in the hiring process.

How it works

A reference check is contacting people a candidate has previously worked for or with — usually former managers or colleagues — to verify their work history and get an outside perspective on their performance, typically done late in the hiring process.

A reference check typically follows a short, consistent set of questions across every candidate — confirming employment dates and role, then asking about performance, reliability, and reasons for leaving — asked of two or three references a candidate provides. Because references are chosen by the candidate, the responses tend to be positive by default; the real signal usually comes from specifics and tone (a reference who answers questions with concrete examples versus one who's noticeably vague or hesitant) rather than the presence or absence of praise itself.

Worked example

Reading between the lines of a reference

A reference check for two finalists produces very different conversations. One former manager answers every question with specific examples — a project the candidate led, a challenge they handled well — and clearly wants to be helpful. The other former manager confirms only dates of employment, gives one-word answers to performance questions, and seems reluctant to elaborate. Neither reference said anything explicitly negative, but the contrast in how forthcoming they were is itself a meaningful signal worth weighing in the decision.

In staffing & high-volume hiring

Reference checks usually happen after a candidate has cleared interviews but before (or alongside) an offer, since they're meant to confirm what the interview process suggested rather than replace it. At high volume, they're often the step most likely to get skipped under time pressure — which is a real tradeoff, since a rushed or skipped reference check trades a small amount of speed for less certainty about a hire that's about to be locked in.

Common mistakes

  • Only checking whether a reference says anything explicitly negative, rather than reading the specificity and enthusiasm of their answers, which is often where the real signal is.
  • Skipping reference checks entirely under time pressure for roles where the tradeoff between speed and certainty genuinely matters.
  • Asking vague, open-ended questions instead of a consistent set that lets responses be compared across candidates the same way a structured interview does.
FAQ

Reference Check FAQ

How is a reference check different from a background check?

A reference check is a conversation with people who know the candidate's work firsthand, focused on performance and fit. A background check is a records-based verification (criminal history, employment dates, credentials) and doesn't involve talking to anyone the candidate has worked with.

How many references should typically be checked?

Two to three is common — enough to see whether a consistent picture emerges across more than one source, without adding excessive delay to an already-late stage of the process.

What if a candidate can't provide references from their most recent job?

This is common when a candidate hasn't told a current employer they're job hunting — most processes accommodate this by allowing references from an earlier role, or delaying the current-employer check until after an offer is extended.

Build a faster, smarter hiring engine.

Start your 30-day free trial — no setup fees, no contracts. Or see ATS Mako in action.

30-day free trial · No setup fees · No long-term contracts